Published on: 2025-12-01

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Landmines Action Needed to Reinforce Ban

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The recent withdrawals from the global ban on antipersonnel landmines by several countries, citing regional security concerns, pose a significant threat to civilian safety and international humanitarian norms. The most likely hypothesis is that these withdrawals will lead to increased landmine usage, exacerbating humanitarian crises, particularly in conflict zones. This assessment is made with moderate confidence due to existing evidence of landmine deployment and the geopolitical tensions influencing these decisions.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The withdrawals from the landmine ban treaty are primarily driven by genuine regional security threats perceived by the withdrawing states. Supporting evidence includes the cited regional security concerns and ongoing conflicts. However, the lack of detailed threat assessments from these states creates uncertainty.
• Hypothesis B: The withdrawals are strategically motivated to enable the use of landmines as a tactical advantage in ongoing or anticipated conflicts. This is supported by reports of increased landmine usage in conflict zones like Ukraine and Myanmar. Contradicting evidence includes international condemnation and potential diplomatic repercussions.
• Assessment: Hypothesis B is currently better supported due to the correlation between withdrawals and increased landmine reports in conflict areas. Indicators that could shift this judgment include new intelligence on specific security threats faced by withdrawing states or changes in their military postures.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The withdrawals are influenced by current geopolitical tensions; landmines will continue to pose a significant threat to civilians; international pressure may not be sufficient to reverse these decisions.
• Information Gaps: Detailed threat assessments from withdrawing states; comprehensive data on landmine casualties and deployment in affected regions.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in reports from Human Rights Watch and Landmine Monitor; possible state-level misinformation regarding the necessity of landmine deployment.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The withdrawal from the landmine ban treaty could lead to increased landmine deployment, exacerbating humanitarian crises and undermining international humanitarian law. This development could further destabilize regions already in conflict and strain international relations.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased diplomatic tensions and erosion of international norms regarding landmine usage.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened risk of civilian casualties and displacement, complicating counter-terrorism and peacekeeping operations.
• Cyber / Information Space: Possible increase in disinformation campaigns to justify landmine usage or withdrawal from treaties.
• Economic / Social: Disruption of agricultural activities and humanitarian aid delivery, leading to economic instability and social unrest.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Increase monitoring of landmine deployment in conflict zones; engage diplomatically with withdrawing states to understand their security concerns.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Strengthen international coalitions to reinforce the landmine ban; develop resilience measures for affected civilian populations.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: States reconsider withdrawals, leading to renewed commitment to the ban.
  • Worst: Widespread landmine deployment increases civilian casualties and regional instability.
  • Most-Likely: Continued landmine usage in conflict areas with limited international intervention.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Human Rights Watch
• International Committee of the Red Cross
• United Nations Secretary-General
• International Campaign to Ban Landmines
• Not clearly identifiable from open sources in this snippet for specific state actors.

7. Thematic Tags

Regional Focus, landmines, international law, humanitarian crisis, geopolitical tensions, treaty withdrawal, regional security, conflict zones

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Causal Layered Analysis (CLA): Analyze events across surface happenings, systems, worldviews, and myths.
• Cross-Impact Simulation: Model ripple effects across neighboring states, conflicts, or economic dependencies.
• Scenario Generation: Explore divergent futures under varying assumptions to identify plausible paths.

Explore more:
Regional Focus Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us