Published on: 2025-11-11

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: China raises alarm over alleged US role in one of the largest Bitcoin hacks – Cointelegraph

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

There is a moderate confidence level that the Chinese allegations of US involvement in the Bitcoin hack are part of a broader geopolitical strategy rather than a substantiated claim. The most supported hypothesis is that China is using this incident to strategically position itself in the ongoing cyber and cryptocurrency domain rivalry with the US. Recommended action includes increased cybersecurity collaboration with allies and a careful diplomatic response to manage tensions.

2. Competing Hypotheses

Hypothesis 1: The US government or its affiliates were involved in the Bitcoin hack, as alleged by China. This hypothesis is supported by the technical analysis report from the CVERC and the timing of the US civil forfeiture complaint.

Hypothesis 2: The allegations are part of a strategic narrative by China to undermine US credibility and assert dominance in the cyber domain. This is supported by the geopolitical context and the lack of concrete evidence linking the US to the hack.

The second hypothesis is more likely due to the absence of direct evidence implicating the US and the potential for China to leverage this narrative for strategic gains.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

Assumptions: It is assumed that the CVERC’s report is unbiased and technically accurate. It is also assumed that the US has no direct involvement in the hack.

Red Flags: The timing of the allegations coincides with heightened US-China tensions, suggesting potential bias. The lack of transparency in the technical analysis and the dormant nature of the hacked funds raise questions about the true motives behind the hack.

Deception Indicators: The narrative could be a strategic move by China to distract from its own cyber activities or to gain leverage in international negotiations.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The allegations could exacerbate US-China tensions, leading to increased cyber warfare and economic sanctions. There is a risk of retaliatory actions in the cyber domain, potentially affecting global financial systems. The incident could also influence international regulatory approaches to cryptocurrency, impacting global markets.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Enhance cybersecurity measures and intelligence sharing with allies to mitigate potential threats.
• Engage in diplomatic dialogue with China to address the allegations and reduce tensions.
• Monitor cryptocurrency transactions for unusual activities that could indicate state-sponsored cyber operations.
• Best-case scenario: Diplomatic engagement leads to de-escalation and improved cybersecurity cooperation.
• Worst-case scenario: Escalation of cyber warfare and economic sanctions disrupt global markets.
• Most-likely scenario: Continued geopolitical posturing with periodic cyber incidents and diplomatic negotiations.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

Chen Zhi (Prince Group Founder), CVERC (Chinese National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center), US Department of Justice.

7. Thematic Tags

Cybersecurity, Geopolitics, Cryptocurrency, US-China Relations

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Adversarial Threat Simulation: Model and simulate actions of cyber adversaries to anticipate vulnerabilities and improve resilience.
• Indicators Development: Detect and monitor behavioral or technical anomalies across systems for early threat detection.
• Bayesian Scenario Modeling: Quantify uncertainty and predict cyberattack pathways using probabilistic inference.

Explore more:
Cybersecurity Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Methodology