Published on: 2025-10-10

Intelligence Report: NEET PG result cancelled 22 aspirants disqualified by NBEMS for malpractice in exams from 2021-2025 – The Times of India

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The cancellation of NEET PG results for 22 aspirants due to malpractice highlights systemic vulnerabilities in examination processes. The most supported hypothesis suggests a coordinated effort to exploit these vulnerabilities, necessitating enhanced security measures. Confidence level: Moderate. Recommended action includes strengthening examination security protocols and conducting comprehensive audits of past examination processes.

2. Competing Hypotheses

1. **Coordinated Malpractice Scheme**: A deliberate and organized effort by individuals or groups to exploit weaknesses in the NEET PG examination process over multiple years, potentially involving insiders.

2. **Isolated Incidents of Cheating**: The disqualifications are the result of isolated incidents of malpractice by individual candidates without broader systemic exploitation.

Using ACH 2.0, the first hypothesis is better supported by the pattern of disqualifications across multiple examination sessions and the involvement of the Karnataka High Court, indicating potential systemic issues rather than isolated cases.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

– **Assumptions**: The integrity of the examination process is assumed to be compromised only by the identified candidates. The role of insiders is not explicitly confirmed.
– **Red Flags**: The lack of transparency in releasing question papers and answer keys raises concerns about the examination’s fairness. The sharp decline in pass rates for foreign medical graduates suggests possible systemic issues.
– **Blind Spots**: Potential involvement of examination officials or technology vulnerabilities has not been thoroughly investigated.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

– **Patterns**: Repeated incidents of malpractice could undermine the credibility of medical qualifications and affect public trust in healthcare professionals.
– **Cascading Threats**: If systemic vulnerabilities are not addressed, future examinations may face increased attempts at exploitation, potentially affecting national healthcare standards.
– **Potential Escalation**: Legal challenges and public scrutiny could escalate, leading to broader reforms in examination processes.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• **Mitigation**: Implement advanced security technologies such as biometric verification and AI-based monitoring during examinations.
• **Audit**: Conduct a thorough audit of past examination processes to identify and rectify systemic vulnerabilities.
• **Scenario Projections**:
  – **Best Case**: Enhanced security measures lead to a significant reduction in malpractice incidents.
  – **Worst Case**: Continued malpractice undermines the credibility of medical qualifications, leading to widespread reforms and potential disruptions in medical education.
  – **Most Likely**: Incremental improvements in security reduce incidents but do not fully eliminate systemic vulnerabilities.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

– Srusti Bommanahalli Rajanna: Disqualified candidate involved in the malpractice case.
– Karnataka High Court: Involved in legal proceedings related to the malpractice incidents.
– NBEMS: National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences, responsible for conducting the NEET PG exams.

7. Thematic Tags

national security threats, cybersecurity, examination integrity, legal scrutiny, educational reform