Published on: 2025-11-03

Intelligence Report: Catholic Colleges in Minnesota Quietly Change Job Posting After Trying to Sneak DEI Requirement Into Listing – Thegatewaypundit.com

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The most supported hypothesis is that the Catholic colleges in Minnesota initially included a DEI requirement in job postings due to internal pressures to align with broader educational trends, but removed it following external backlash. Confidence level: Moderate. Recommended action: Monitor similar institutions for policy shifts and public reactions to DEI initiatives.

2. Competing Hypotheses

1. The colleges attempted to include a DEI requirement in job postings as part of a strategic alignment with progressive educational standards, but retracted it due to public and political pressure.
2. The inclusion of the DEI requirement was an administrative oversight, and its removal was a routine correction rather than a response to external pressures.

Using ACH 2.0, the first hypothesis is better supported due to the timing of the removal following media coverage and the lack of immediate administrative clarification suggesting a reactive measure rather than a pre-planned correction.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

– Assumption: The colleges are influenced by both internal DEI advocacy and external political pressures.
– Red Flag: Lack of direct statements from college officials explaining the rationale behind the initial inclusion and subsequent removal of the DEI requirement.
– Blind Spot: The internal decision-making processes and pressures within the colleges remain opaque.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

– Potential for increased scrutiny on educational institutions regarding DEI policies, leading to polarized public discourse.
– Risk of reputational damage to colleges perceived as yielding to political pressures, affecting student and faculty recruitment.
– Escalation scenario: Legislative actions targeting DEI initiatives in educational institutions could intensify, impacting funding and policy frameworks.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Monitor legislative developments and public sentiment regarding DEI in education to anticipate shifts in institutional policies.
• Best case: Colleges balance DEI initiatives with stakeholder expectations, maintaining institutional integrity and public trust.
• Worst case: Heightened political and public backlash leads to restrictive legislation and funding cuts for institutions perceived as promoting DEI.
• Most likely: Incremental adjustments in DEI policies as colleges navigate between internal advocacy and external pressures.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

– Sandra Mitchell (Senior Diversity Officer)
– Saint John’s University
– College of Saint Benedict

7. Thematic Tags

national security threats, cybersecurity, counter-terrorism, regional focus