Published on: 2026-01-18

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Sudans people endure horror and hell in war says UN rights chief

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The ongoing civil war in Sudan, characterized by foreign involvement and severe humanitarian crises, is exacerbating the suffering of the civilian population. The conflict is marked by significant militarization and alleged war crimes, particularly by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The situation is likely to deteriorate further without international intervention. Overall confidence in this assessment is moderate due to limited access to on-the-ground intelligence.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The conflict in Sudan is primarily driven by internal power struggles between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the RSF, with foreign actors playing a secondary role. Evidence includes the historical rivalry between SAF and RSF and the internal dynamics of Sudanese politics. However, the extent of foreign influence remains uncertain.
• Hypothesis B: Foreign actors are significantly influencing the Sudanese conflict, using it as a proxy battleground to advance their regional interests. This is supported by reports of arms supplies from the UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Turkiye. Contradicting evidence includes denials from these countries and the lack of direct evidence of strategic control.
• Assessment: Hypothesis B is currently better supported due to consistent reports of foreign arms supplies and political backing, despite denials. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include verified evidence of strategic decision-making by foreign actors or a significant shift in domestic political dynamics.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The conflict will continue to be characterized by high levels of violence and humanitarian crises; foreign actors will maintain their current levels of involvement; the international community will remain largely ineffective in mediating the conflict.
• Information Gaps: Detailed intelligence on the strategic objectives of foreign actors; reliable data on the ground situation in conflict zones; insights into the internal decision-making processes of SAF and RSF.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in reports from international organizations and media; risk of misinformation from involved parties; possibility of strategic deception by foreign actors to obscure their involvement.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The conflict in Sudan is likely to continue destabilizing the region, with potential spillover effects into neighboring countries. The humanitarian crisis will worsen, increasing pressure on international aid systems and potentially leading to broader geopolitical tensions.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased regional instability; risk of proxy conflict escalation involving Middle Eastern powers.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Increased risk of radicalization and recruitment by extremist groups exploiting the chaos; potential for cross-border terrorism.
• Cyber / Information Space: Likely increase in propaganda and misinformation campaigns by involved parties; potential cyber operations targeting critical infrastructure.
• Economic / Social: Further deterioration of Sudan’s economy; exacerbation of food insecurity and displacement crises; potential for social unrest.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Increase intelligence gathering on foreign involvement; enhance monitoring of humanitarian conditions; engage in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Strengthen partnerships with regional actors to mediate conflict; develop resilience measures for humanitarian aid delivery; support capacity building for local governance.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: Successful international mediation leads to a ceasefire and peace talks.
  • Worst: Escalation into a broader regional conflict involving direct military engagement by foreign powers.
  • Most-Likely: Continued low-intensity conflict with intermittent ceasefires and ongoing humanitarian crises.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Volker Turk (UN rights chief)
• Rapid Support Forces (RSF)
• Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF)
• United Arab Emirates
• Egypt
• Saudi Arabia
• Iran
• Turkiye

7. Thematic Tags

regional conflicts, civil war, humanitarian crisis, foreign intervention, arms trade, regional instability, war crimes, displacement

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Causal Layered Analysis (CLA): Analyze events across surface happenings, systems, worldviews, and myths.
• Cross-Impact Simulation: Model ripple effects across neighboring states, conflicts, or economic dependencies.
• Scenario Generation: Explore divergent futures under varying assumptions to identify plausible paths.

Explore more:
Regional Conflicts Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us