Published on: 2026-01-28

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: These are the sticking points as phase two of the Gaza ceasefire arrives

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The transition to phase two of the Gaza ceasefire involves significant uncertainty regarding governance and disarmament, with moderate confidence in the hypothesis that Hamas will resist full disarmament despite cooperation with the new technocratic government. This situation affects regional stability and international relations, particularly involving Israel, Hamas, and the United States.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: Hamas will cooperate with the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) to facilitate a peaceful transition and eventual disarmament. Evidence includes public statements by Hamas indicating willingness to hand over power and initial steps towards cooperation. Key uncertainties include the depth of Hamas’s commitment to disarmament and potential internal dissent.
• Hypothesis B: Hamas will resist full disarmament and maintain significant influence over Gaza, potentially undermining the NCAG’s authority. Contradicting evidence includes Hamas’s rejection of international forces handling its weapons and historical reluctance to disarm. This hypothesis is supported by the group’s strategic interests in retaining military capabilities.
• Assessment: Hypothesis B is currently better supported due to Hamas’s strategic interests and historical behavior patterns. Indicators that could shift this judgment include verified disarmament actions by Hamas or increased international pressure leading to compliance.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: Hamas’s public statements reflect genuine intent; the NCAG has the capacity to govern effectively; international forces will be accepted by local populations.
• Information Gaps: Detailed plans for NCAG governance and disarmament processes; internal Hamas dynamics and potential dissent; the role and composition of the international stabilisation force.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in public statements from Hamas and NCAG; risk of strategic deception by Hamas to buy time or consolidate power.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The evolution of the ceasefire’s second phase could significantly impact regional stability and international diplomatic efforts. The success or failure of disarmament and governance transitions will influence broader geopolitical dynamics.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased tensions between Israel and Hamas if disarmament fails; implications for US foreign policy in the Middle East.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Risk of renewed hostilities or terrorist activities if disarmament is not achieved; challenges in monitoring and enforcing ceasefire terms.
• Cyber / Information Space: Possible increase in propaganda or misinformation campaigns by involved parties to sway public opinion or international support.
• Economic / Social: Economic instability in Gaza if governance transitions are not smooth; potential humanitarian concerns if conflict resumes.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Enhance intelligence collection on Hamas’s internal dynamics; increase diplomatic engagement with key stakeholders to support NCAG efforts.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures for potential conflict resurgence; strengthen partnerships with regional allies to support stabilization efforts.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best Case: Successful disarmament and stable governance lead to long-term peace. Trigger: Verified disarmament actions.
  • Worst Case: Breakdown of ceasefire and resumption of hostilities. Trigger: Significant violations or attacks.
  • Most Likely: Partial disarmament with ongoing tensions. Trigger: Continued Hamas influence and strategic delays.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Hamas
• National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG)
• Israeli Government
• United States Government
• Jared Kushner
• Hazem Qasem

7. Thematic Tags

Counter-Terrorism, ceasefire, disarmament, Hamas, Israel, Gaza governance, international diplomacy, regional stability

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• ACH 2.0: Reconstruct likely threat actor intentions via hypothesis testing and structured refutation.
• Indicators Development: Track radicalization signals and propaganda patterns to anticipate operational planning.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Analyze spread/adaptation of ideological narratives for recruitment/incitement signals.

Explore more:
Counter-Terrorism Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us