Published on: 2025-03-04

Intelligence Report: Donald Trump wants to delete climate from federal websites heres how you can track the changes – The Verge

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Recent actions have been observed involving the removal or alteration of climate-related content on federal websites. This report highlights the strategic implications of these changes, which may affect public access to environmental information. Key recommendations include monitoring these changes and advocating for transparency to ensure informed decision-making by stakeholders.

2. Detailed Analysis

The following structured analytic techniques have been applied for this analysis:

Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH)

The primary hypothesis is that the changes are politically motivated to align with certain policy objectives. Alternative hypotheses include technical updates or administrative oversight.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths: Centralized tracking of changes increases transparency.
Weaknesses: Potential loss of critical environmental data.
Opportunities: Advocacy for data preservation and policy reform.
Threats: Reduced public awareness and engagement on climate issues.

Indicators Development

Key indicators of emerging threats include the frequency of content removal, the nature of altered data, and public response to these changes.

3. Implications and Strategic Risks

The removal of climate-related content poses risks to national security by potentially undermining environmental policy and public health initiatives. It may also affect regional stability by limiting access to information crucial for disaster preparedness and response. Economically, these changes could impact sectors reliant on environmental data, such as agriculture and renewable energy.

4. Recommendations and Outlook

Recommendations:

• Implement a robust monitoring system to track changes in federal websites.
• Advocate for policy frameworks that ensure the preservation of critical environmental data.
• Encourage collaboration between government agencies and non-profit organizations to maintain data integrity.

Outlook:

Best-case scenario: Restoration of removed content and increased transparency.
Worst-case scenario: Continued data removal leading to a significant information gap.
Most likely outcome: Partial restoration with ongoing advocacy efforts required.

5. Key Individuals and Entities

The report mentions significant individuals and organizations such as Donald Trump and the Environmental Data Governance Initiative (EDGI). These entities play crucial roles in the ongoing developments and responses to the changes in federal website content.