Published on: 2026-02-19

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Ambassador Mike Waltz Hamas must and will disarm

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The US, under Ambassador Mike Waltz, is pushing for the complete disarmament of Hamas as a prerequisite for Gaza’s reconstruction, with moderate confidence in the feasibility of this plan. The initiative involves significant international cooperation and financial pledges but faces potential resistance from Hamas and regional actors. The outcome will significantly affect regional stability and US influence in the Middle East.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The disarmament of Hamas will proceed successfully, supported by international pressure and financial incentives. Evidence includes the involvement of 27 nations and a $5 billion pledge for reconstruction. However, uncertainties remain regarding Hamas’s willingness to comply and the effectiveness of the International Stabilization Force.
• Hypothesis B: Hamas will resist disarmament, leading to continued instability in Gaza. This is supported by historical resistance from Hamas and potential regional support for their cause. Contradicting evidence includes the current ceasefire and international pressure.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the broad international backing and financial incentives. However, indicators such as renewed hostilities or lack of compliance from Hamas could shift this judgment.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: Hamas will act rationally in response to international pressure; international actors will maintain their commitment to the peace plan; the International Stabilization Force will be effective.
• Information Gaps: Details on Hamas’s internal decision-making processes and the specific capabilities of the International Stabilization Force.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential US bias in overestimating international support; risk of deception by Hamas regarding disarmament intentions.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The disarmament initiative could reshape the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, affecting US relations with regional allies and adversaries.

• Political / Geopolitical: Success could enhance US influence, while failure might embolden adversarial actors like Iran.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Effective disarmament could reduce terrorism risks, but failure might lead to increased hostilities.
• Cyber / Information Space: Potential for cyber operations by Hamas or sympathetic actors to disrupt the peace process.
• Economic / Social: Reconstruction could improve economic conditions, but failure might exacerbate humanitarian issues.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Enhance intelligence collection on Hamas’s intentions; increase diplomatic engagement with regional partners.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures for potential cyber threats; strengthen partnerships with Gulf states.
• Scenario Outlook: Best: Successful disarmament and reconstruction; Worst: Renewed conflict and humanitarian crisis; Most-Likely: Partial compliance with ongoing tensions.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Ambassador Mike Waltz
• Hamas
• International Stabilization Force
• National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG)
• Board of Peace

7. Thematic Tags

Counter-Terrorism, Middle East peace process, international diplomacy, disarmament, humanitarian aid, regional stability, US foreign policy

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• ACH 2.0: Reconstruct likely threat actor intentions via hypothesis testing and structured refutation.
• Indicators Development: Track radicalization signals and propaganda patterns to anticipate operational planning.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Analyze spread/adaptation of ideological narratives for recruitment/incitement signals.

Explore more:
Counter-Terrorism Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us