Published on: 2025-05-15

Intelligence Report: Anti-Israel Rutgers Center Teaches Students How To Thwart ICE – Washington Free Beacon

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The Rutgers University Center, led by Sahar Aziz, is under scrutiny for allegedly advising students on methods to evade U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and for hosting events perceived as anti-Israel. This has prompted a congressional investigation into potential anti-Semitic activities and connections to terrorism. Recommendations include increased monitoring and evaluation of university-funded programs to ensure compliance with federal guidelines.

2. Detailed Analysis

The following structured analytic techniques have been applied to ensure methodological consistency:

ACH 2.0

Analysis suggests the center’s activities may align with broader anti-Israel narratives, potentially influencing student activism and resistance against federal authorities.

Indicators Development

Monitoring digital communications and social media for signs of radicalization and coordination of protests or resistance activities is crucial.

Narrative Pattern Analysis

The center’s seminars and events appear to propagate narratives that could incite anti-Israel sentiment and encourage defiance against immigration enforcement.

3. Implications and Strategic Risks

The activities at Rutgers University may contribute to increased polarization on campuses, potentially leading to heightened tensions and security risks. The involvement of federal funding raises concerns about compliance with anti-terrorism financing laws. There is a risk of reputational damage to the university and potential federal funding cuts if non-compliance is confirmed.

4. Recommendations and Outlook

• Conduct a thorough audit of university programs receiving federal funds to ensure adherence to legal standards.
• Enhance collaboration between educational institutions and federal agencies to address potential security threats.
• Scenario-based projections:
  • Best Case: Increased oversight leads to compliance and improved campus safety.
  • Worst Case: Continued non-compliance results in significant funding cuts and legal action.
  • Most Likely: Heightened scrutiny prompts policy adjustments and increased transparency.

5. Key Individuals and Entities

Sahar Aziz, Golnaz Fakhimi, Raquel Aldana, Joseph Massad, Susan Akram, Lara Sheehi.

6. Thematic Tags

national security threats, cybersecurity, counter-terrorism, regional focus