Published on: 2025-12-16

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Deliberate Internet Shutdowns

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Deliberate internet shutdowns, exemplified by recent events in Afghanistan, are increasingly used by governments to control information and suppress dissent. The most likely hypothesis is that these shutdowns are primarily aimed at maintaining regime stability by preventing communication during crises. This affects millions, disrupting essential services and human rights. Overall confidence in this judgment is moderate.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: Internet shutdowns are primarily used to prevent the organization of protests and dissemination of information during politically sensitive periods. This is supported by the timing of shutdowns during elections and protests. However, the lack of official explanations creates uncertainty about the true motives.
• Hypothesis B: Shutdowns are implemented to prevent specific activities deemed immoral or illegal by the governing authorities, as indicated by the Taliban’s stated reason for their localized shutdown. This hypothesis is less supported due to the broader pattern of shutdowns during political unrest.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the consistent pattern of shutdowns coinciding with political unrest and crises. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include official statements clarifying motives or evidence of shutdowns during non-political events.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: Governments view internet access as a threat to regime stability; shutdowns are technically feasible and enforceable; international backlash is manageable.
• Information Gaps: Specific government communications or directives regarding shutdowns; data on the economic impact of shutdowns.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in interpreting government motives; risk of governments using misinformation to justify shutdowns.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The increasing frequency of internet shutdowns could lead to more authoritarian control over information, affecting global norms around internet freedom.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased international condemnation and sanctions; risk of regional instability if shutdowns coincide with crises.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Possible degradation of emergency response capabilities; increased difficulty in monitoring extremist activities.
• Cyber / Information Space: Potential for increased cyber operations targeting infrastructure; challenges in information dissemination and verification.
• Economic / Social: Disruption of economic activities and social services; potential for increased public unrest and loss of trust in government.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Enhance monitoring of internet traffic patterns; engage with international bodies to address internet freedom violations.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures for critical infrastructure; strengthen partnerships with digital rights organizations.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: International pressure leads to a reduction in shutdowns.
  • Worst: Shutdowns become normalized, leading to widespread human rights abuses.
  • Most-Likely: Continued use of shutdowns with periodic international condemnation.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Not clearly identifiable from open sources in this snippet.

7. Thematic Tags

Counter-Terrorism, internet shutdowns, information control, human rights, political unrest, cyber operations, authoritarian regimes, digital rights

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• ACH 2.0: Reconstruct likely threat actor intentions via hypothesis testing and structured refutation.
• Indicators Development: Track radicalization signals and propaganda patterns to anticipate operational planning.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Analyze spread/adaptation of ideological narratives for recruitment/incitement signals.
• Network Influence Mapping: Map influence relationships to assess actor impact.

Explore more:
Counter-Terrorism Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us