Published on: 2025-12-08

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Why some African countries are prone to military takeovers

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Military takeovers in Africa are primarily driven by socioeconomic grievances, weakened institutions, and dissatisfaction with civilian governance, particularly in handling security crises. The most likely hypothesis is that these factors create an environment conducive to military intervention. This affects political stability and governance across the continent, with moderate confidence in this assessment.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: Military takeovers are primarily driven by socioeconomic grievances and dissatisfaction with civilian governance. This is supported by reports of deepening grievances and weakened institutions. However, the extent to which these factors alone lead to coups is uncertain.
• Hypothesis B: Military takeovers are opportunistic actions by military leaders seeking power, irrespective of civilian governance performance. This is supported by instances where military leaders have seized power following elections or political transitions. However, this does not fully account for the widespread nature of the phenomenon.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported, as socioeconomic grievances and dissatisfaction with governance are consistently reported across multiple countries. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include changes in governance performance or military actions in the absence of significant grievances.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: Socioeconomic grievances are a primary driver of military coups; civilian governments are perceived as ineffective; military leaders are motivated by governance failures rather than personal gain.
• Information Gaps: Detailed data on the internal motivations of military leaders and the specific triggers for each coup.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in reporting from sources with vested interests in either civilian or military governance; possible manipulation by military leaders to justify coups.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The continuation of military takeovers could destabilize political systems and undermine democratic processes across Africa, potentially leading to increased regional instability.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased international intervention or sanctions; shifts in regional power dynamics.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Possible deterioration of security environments, particularly in regions already facing insurgencies.
• Cyber / Information Space: Potential for increased cyber operations targeting governmental and military communications.
• Economic / Social: Economic instability and social unrest could increase as a result of disrupted governance and potential international sanctions.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Enhance monitoring of military movements and political developments in at-risk countries; engage with regional bodies to support democratic processes.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures to support civilian governance; strengthen partnerships with regional organizations to promote stability.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: Strengthened civilian governance reduces coup attempts, supported by international aid.
  • Worst: Increased frequency of coups leads to widespread regional instability and conflict.
  • Most-Likely: Continued sporadic coups with regional variations based on local grievances and governance performance.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Brice Oligui Nguema
• Mahamat Idris Deby
• Mamady Doumbouya
• Gen. Abdel-Fattah Burhan
• Not clearly identifiable from open sources in this snippet.

7. Thematic Tags

National Security Threats, military coups, governance, socioeconomic grievances, political instability, Africa, security crises, democratic processes

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Cognitive Bias Stress Test: Expose and correct potential biases in assessments through red-teaming and structured challenge.
• Bayesian Scenario Modeling: Use probabilistic forecasting for conflict trajectories or escalation likelihood.
• Network Influence Mapping: Map influence relationships to assess actor impact.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Deconstruct and track propaganda or influence narratives.

Explore more:
National Security Threats Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us