‘From outgroup hate to ingroup love’ How political crises cause a shift in viral online content – Phys.Org
Published on: 2025-08-25
Intelligence Report: ‘From outgroup hate to ingroup love’ How political crises cause a shift in viral online content – Phys.Org
1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)
The study suggests that political crises can shift online engagement from outgroup hostility to ingroup solidarity. The most supported hypothesis is that during crises, online content emphasizing unity within political groups becomes more viral than content expressing hostility towards opposing groups. Confidence in this hypothesis is moderate due to the reliance on specific case studies. Recommended action includes monitoring social media trends during crises to anticipate shifts in public sentiment and engagement.
2. Competing Hypotheses
1. **Hypothesis A**: Political crises lead to increased ingroup solidarity, resulting in viral content that emphasizes unity and shared identity within political groups.
2. **Hypothesis B**: Political crises exacerbate outgroup hostility, leading to increased engagement with content that criticizes or mocks opposing political groups.
Using ACH 2.0, Hypothesis A is better supported by the data, which shows increased engagement with posts expressing unity during crises, such as the attempted assassination of Donald Trump and Joe Biden’s campaign suspension.
3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags
– **Assumptions**: The analysis assumes that social media engagement metrics accurately reflect broader public sentiment. It also presumes that the observed shifts are directly caused by the crises rather than other factors.
– **Red Flags**: Limited scope of events analyzed may not represent all political crises. Potential bias in data collection and interpretation, especially if political affiliations of researchers influence conclusions.
4. Implications and Strategic Risks
– **Patterns**: Increased ingroup solidarity during crises could lead to temporary reductions in political polarization online.
– **Risks**: If not managed, these shifts could be exploited to manipulate public sentiment, potentially destabilizing political environments.
– **Geopolitical Dimension**: Similar patterns observed in international contexts, such as the Ukrainian response to Russian aggression, suggest a broader applicability of findings.
5. Recommendations and Outlook
- Monitor social media platforms during political crises to identify shifts in public sentiment and engagement patterns.
- Develop strategies to counter potential manipulation of these shifts by malicious actors.
- Scenario Projections:
- Best: Enhanced public unity and reduced polarization during crises.
- Worst: Exploitation of sentiment shifts leading to increased division post-crisis.
- Most Likely: Temporary unity followed by a return to pre-crisis polarization levels.
6. Key Individuals and Entities
– Sadie Harley
– Robert Egan
– Malia Mark
– Franklin Graham
– Laura Ingraham
– Robert Reich
– Nancy Pelosi
7. Thematic Tags
national security threats, cybersecurity, counter-terrorism, regional focus



