Published on: 2025-07-20

Intelligence Report: I call bulls on that Secret Services sloped roof saga takes a new turn in Trump assassination attempt – Wnd.com

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Recent revelations regarding a 2016 assassination attempt on Donald Trump highlight significant security lapses by the Secret Service. Disputes between the Secret Service and Trump’s campaign staff over security measures, particularly concerning rooftop vulnerabilities, contributed to the incident. The failure to adequately address these vulnerabilities underscores systemic issues within the agency’s operational protocols. Immediate review and reinforcement of security procedures are recommended to prevent future occurrences.

2. Detailed Analysis

The following structured analytic techniques have been applied to ensure methodological consistency:

Cognitive Bias Stress Test

Potential biases were identified in the initial security assessments, particularly the underestimation of rooftop vulnerabilities. Red teaming exercises revealed a lack of challenge to prevailing assumptions, leading to oversight.

Bayesian Scenario Modeling

Probabilistic forecasting suggests a moderate likelihood of similar security failures if current protocols remain unchanged. Escalation risks are heightened without procedural reforms.

Network Influence Mapping

Analysis of influence dynamics between Secret Service personnel and campaign staff indicates a breakdown in communication and decision-making processes, impacting security outcomes.

3. Implications and Strategic Risks

The incident reveals systemic vulnerabilities within the Secret Service’s operational framework, posing risks to national security. The failure to address known security gaps could embolden adversaries, increasing the likelihood of future threats. Additionally, the incident may erode public confidence in protective services, potentially impacting political stability.

4. Recommendations and Outlook

• Conduct a comprehensive review of Secret Service protocols, emphasizing the identification and mitigation of security vulnerabilities.
• Enhance training programs to ensure personnel are equipped to identify and address potential threats effectively.
• Scenario-based projections:
  • Best case: Implementation of improved security measures leads to enhanced protection and restored public confidence.
  • Worst case: Continued security lapses result in successful attacks, undermining national security.
  • Most likely: Incremental improvements in security protocols reduce but do not eliminate vulnerabilities.

5. Key Individuals and Entities

Thomas Crook, Corey Comperatore, Kimberly Cheatle, Chuck Grassley, Tim Burke, Sean Curran

6. Thematic Tags

national security threats, cybersecurity, counter-terrorism, regional focus