Published on: 2026-01-10

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Iran’s top security body US Israel orchestrating riots to drag country into insecurity

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The Iranian Supreme National Security Council (SNSC) alleges that the United States and Israel are orchestrating riots to destabilize Iran. This assertion is part of a broader narrative of external threats to national security. The most likely hypothesis is that these claims are intended to consolidate internal support and justify security measures. The affected parties include Iranian citizens, regional actors, and international stakeholders. Overall confidence in this assessment is moderate.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The US and Israel are actively orchestrating riots in Iran as part of a strategic campaign to destabilize the country. Supporting evidence includes SNSC’s statements and historical tensions. Contradicting evidence includes lack of direct evidence linking foreign actors to specific incidents. Key uncertainties involve the extent of foreign involvement and the authenticity of SNSC’s claims.
• Hypothesis B: The Iranian government is using the narrative of foreign orchestration to deflect from domestic issues and justify crackdowns on dissent. Supporting evidence includes the timing of the narrative amidst economic grievances and the government’s history of blaming external forces. Contradicting evidence includes genuine foreign interest in destabilizing Iran.
• Assessment: Hypothesis B is currently better supported due to the lack of concrete evidence linking foreign actors to the riots and the historical pattern of Iran attributing internal unrest to external enemies. Indicators that could shift this judgment include credible intelligence confirming foreign orchestration.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The SNSC’s statements reflect a strategic communication effort; internal unrest is primarily driven by economic issues; foreign actors have a vested interest in Iran’s instability.
• Information Gaps: Direct evidence of foreign involvement in the riots; independent verification of SNSC’s claims; detailed understanding of internal dissent dynamics.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential confirmation bias in Iranian government narratives; source bias from state-controlled media; possible manipulation of public perception by Iranian authorities.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

This development could exacerbate tensions between Iran and Western countries, potentially leading to increased regional instability. The narrative of foreign orchestration may be used to justify harsher domestic measures, affecting civil liberties and social cohesion.

• Political / Geopolitical: Escalation of rhetoric and potential retaliatory actions by Iran against perceived foreign threats.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened security measures and potential crackdowns on dissent, increasing domestic tensions.
• Cyber / Information Space: Potential for increased cyber operations targeting Iranian infrastructure or propaganda campaigns.
• Economic / Social: Continued economic strain due to sanctions and internal unrest could lead to further social discontent.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Monitor Iranian state communications for shifts in narrative; engage in diplomatic channels to de-escalate tensions; enhance intelligence collection on foreign involvement claims.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures to counter potential cyber threats; strengthen regional partnerships to mitigate geopolitical risks; support initiatives addressing economic grievances in Iran.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: De-escalation of tensions with diplomatic engagement and economic reforms in Iran.
  • Worst: Escalation into broader regional conflict with increased foreign intervention.
  • Most-Likely: Continued internal unrest with periodic flare-ups and sustained geopolitical tensions.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Supreme National Security Council (SNSC)
• US Government
• Israeli Government
• Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei
• General Qassem Soleimani (posthumous)

7. Thematic Tags

national security threats, national security, hybrid warfare, geopolitical tensions, economic instability, internal unrest, foreign intervention, strategic communication

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Cognitive Bias Stress Test: Expose and correct potential biases in assessments through red-teaming and structured challenge.
• Bayesian Scenario Modeling: Use probabilistic forecasting for conflict trajectories or escalation likelihood.
• Network Influence Mapping: Map relationships between state and non-state actors for impact estimation.

Explore more:
National Security Threats Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us