Israel Tops Global List for Journalist Deaths in 2025, According to RSF Report


Published on: 2025-12-09

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Israel remained leading killer of journalists in 2025 RSF

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Israel is reported as the leading killer of journalists in 2025, primarily due to military actions in Gaza. This situation raises significant concerns about press freedom and international accountability. The most supported hypothesis is that Israeli military operations are intentionally targeting journalists to control information dissemination. This assessment is made with moderate confidence due to potential biases in reporting and lack of direct evidence.

2. Competing Hypotheses

  • Hypothesis A: Israeli military operations in Gaza are intentionally targeting journalists to suppress unfavorable media coverage. Supporting evidence includes the high number of journalist casualties and restricted access for foreign reporters. Contradicting evidence includes potential bias in reporting and lack of direct evidence of intent.
  • Hypothesis B: Journalists are casualties of broader military operations in a conflict zone, not specifically targeted. Supporting evidence includes the chaotic nature of conflict zones and the possibility of collateral damage. Contradicting evidence includes the high proportion of journalist casualties relative to other conflict zones.
  • Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the pattern of journalist casualties and restricted media access, though further evidence is needed to confirm intentional targeting. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include new evidence of military directives or changes in casualty patterns.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

  • Assumptions: The RSF report is accurate and unbiased; Israeli military operations are conducted with strategic intent; journalists in conflict zones are primarily targeted for their work.
  • Information Gaps: Direct evidence of Israeli military intent to target journalists; independent verification of casualty figures; insights into Israeli military decision-making processes.
  • Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in RSF reporting; propaganda or misinformation from conflicting parties; cognitive biases affecting interpretation of casualty data.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The continued targeting of journalists in conflict zones could exacerbate tensions between Israel and international media organizations, potentially leading to increased scrutiny and diplomatic pressure. This development may also influence global perceptions of press freedom and human rights.

  • Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased international condemnation and diplomatic isolation of Israel.
  • Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened risk of retaliatory actions against Israeli interests globally.
  • Cyber / Information Space: Increased cyber operations targeting Israeli and international media outlets to control narratives.
  • Economic / Social: Potential impact on Israel’s economic relations due to reputational damage and increased social unrest within affected regions.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

  • Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Enhance monitoring of media reports and casualty data; engage with international organizations to verify claims; prepare diplomatic responses to potential escalations.
  • Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures for journalists in conflict zones; strengthen partnerships with media organizations to ensure accurate reporting; invest in capability development for conflict reporting.
  • Scenario Outlook:
    • Best: De-escalation of conflict and improved access for journalists, reducing casualties.
    • Worst: Escalation of conflict and increased targeting of journalists, leading to international crises.
    • Most-Likely: Continued tensions with sporadic incidents of journalist casualties, maintaining current levels of international scrutiny.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

  • Israeli Military
  • Reporters Without Borders (RSF)
  • Thibaut Bruttin, RSF’s Director General
  • Shireen.ps monitoring website
  • Al Jazeera, Reuters, The Associated Press

7. Thematic Tags

regional conflicts, press freedom, conflict reporting, Israel-Gaza conflict, international relations, media safety, human rights, military operations

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

  • Causal Layered Analysis (CLA): Analyze events across surface happenings, systems, worldviews, and myths.
  • Cross-Impact Simulation: Model ripple effects across neighboring states, conflicts, or economic dependencies.
  • Scenario Generation: Explore divergent futures under varying assumptions to identify plausible paths.


Explore more:
Regional Conflicts Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us

Israel remained leading killer of journalists in 2025 RSF - Image 1
Israel remained leading killer of journalists in 2025 RSF - Image 2
Israel remained leading killer of journalists in 2025 RSF - Image 3
Israel remained leading killer of journalists in 2025 RSF - Image 4