Published on: 2026-01-27

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: London-based Persian TV aims to air truth about Iran protests

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The London-based Persian-language TV station Iran International plays a critical role in disseminating information about the protests in Iran, despite being labeled a “terrorist” organization by Tehran. The station’s reporting, including claims of high casualty figures, could significantly influence both domestic and international perceptions of the Iranian regime. Overall confidence in this assessment is moderate due to potential bias and information gaps.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: Iran International is an independent media outlet providing unbiased reporting on the Iranian protests, supported by its claims of independence and broad audience reach. However, the station’s alleged Saudi connections and Tehran’s accusations raise questions about potential bias.
• Hypothesis B: Iran International is influenced by external actors, potentially Saudi Arabia, to destabilize the Iranian regime. This is supported by Tehran’s allegations and the station’s significant resources and reach, though the station denies these claims.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the station’s operational transparency and denial of external control. However, indicators such as financial audits or leaks about funding could shift this judgment.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: Iran International operates independently; the reported casualty figures are accurate; the Iranian regime’s labeling of the station as a “terrorist” entity is politically motivated.
• Information Gaps: Detailed financial records of Iran International; independent verification of casualty figures; insights into the Iranian regime’s internal deliberations regarding media labeling.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential source bias from Iran International due to its political stance; cognitive biases in interpreting casualty figures; possible manipulation of information by both the Iranian regime and external actors.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The activities of Iran International could exacerbate tensions between Iran and its regional adversaries, potentially influencing international diplomatic stances and internal Iranian stability.

• Political / Geopolitical: Increased hostility between Iran and nations perceived to support Iran International, potentially leading to diplomatic rifts.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened security measures by Iran against perceived foreign influence, possibly leading to further crackdowns on dissent.
• Cyber / Information Space: Potential cyber operations targeting Iran International or its audience, aiming to disrupt its broadcasts or discredit its reporting.
• Economic / Social: Prolonged unrest could further destabilize Iran’s economy, exacerbating public grievances and social unrest.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Monitor Iran International’s broadcasts for shifts in narrative; verify casualty figures through independent sources; assess Iran’s media strategy and countermeasures.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience measures against potential cyber threats; engage with regional partners to address misinformation risks; enhance intelligence-sharing on media influence operations.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: Iran International’s reporting leads to increased international pressure on Iran, fostering reforms.
  • Worst: Escalation of regional tensions due to perceived foreign interference, leading to conflict.
  • Most-Likely: Continued media influence on public perception, with periodic escalations in Iranian government responses.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Farnoosh Faraji, Journalist at Iran International
• Reza Mohaddes, Presenter at Iran International
• Adam Baillie, Spokesman for Iran International
• Iran International, Persian-language TV station
• HRANA, Human Rights Activists News Agency

7. Thematic Tags

Counter-Terrorism, media influence, Iran protests, regional tensions, information warfare, human rights, cyber security, geopolitical risk

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• ACH 2.0: Reconstruct likely threat actor intentions via hypothesis testing and structured refutation.
• Indicators Development: Track radicalization signals and propaganda patterns to anticipate operational planning.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Analyze spread/adaptation of ideological narratives for recruitment/incitement signals.

Explore more:
Counter-Terrorism Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us