Published on: 2026-01-24

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Muslim nonprofit fundraiser that raked in 265K from taxpayers features trinkets promoting Hamas other terror groups

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The Muslim American Society’s New York chapter, which has received significant taxpayer funding, hosted an event featuring merchandise promoting US-designated terrorist groups. This raises concerns about the misuse of public funds and potential radicalization. The most likely hypothesis is that the nonprofit’s activities are inadvertently supporting extremist narratives. Overall confidence in this assessment is moderate due to limited direct evidence of intent.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The Muslim American Society’s New York chapter knowingly supports extremist groups and uses public funds to promote their ideologies. Evidence includes the sale of merchandise promoting Hamas and other groups, but the intent behind these actions remains unclear.
• Hypothesis B: The nonprofit’s leadership is unaware of the extremist nature of the merchandise sold at the event, and the incident is a result of poor oversight or external influence. This is supported by the lack of direct evidence linking the leadership to extremist activities.
• Assessment: Hypothesis B is currently better supported due to the absence of direct evidence of intentional support for terrorism by the nonprofit’s leadership. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include direct communications or financial transactions linking the nonprofit to extremist groups.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The nonprofit’s leadership is responsible for oversight of events; public funds are used as intended; extremist merchandise was not sanctioned by the leadership.
• Information Gaps: Details on the decision-making process for event content; direct links between leadership and extremist groups; comprehensive financial audits.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in media reporting; possible manipulation of event content by external actors; reliance on a single source for event details.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

This development could lead to increased scrutiny of nonprofit funding and oversight, potentially affecting community relations and public trust. It may also influence local political dynamics and counter-terrorism efforts.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for strained relations between Muslim communities and local government; increased political pressure on funding oversight.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened risk of radicalization if extremist narratives are not addressed; potential for increased surveillance and law enforcement action.
• Cyber / Information Space: Risk of misinformation or propaganda spread through digital platforms; potential for cyber monitoring of nonprofit activities.
• Economic / Social: Possible reduction in funding for community programs; social tensions due to perceived support for extremism.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Conduct a thorough audit of the nonprofit’s activities and funding; engage with community leaders to address concerns and clarify intentions.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop stronger oversight mechanisms for taxpayer-funded programs; foster partnerships with community organizations to promote transparency.
• Scenario Outlook: Best: Improved oversight and community relations; Worst: Escalation of tensions and reduced funding; Most-Likely: Increased scrutiny and policy adjustments with moderate community impact.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Muslim American Society (MAS) New York chapter
• Mayor Zohran Mamdani
• Abdullah Akl
• Sherif Ahmed
• Hannah Towfeik
• Julie Menin
• Not clearly identifiable from open sources in this snippet

7. Thematic Tags

Counter-Terrorism, nonprofit oversight, radicalization, public funding, community relations, political dynamics, extremist narratives

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• ACH 2.0: Reconstruct likely threat actor intentions via hypothesis testing and structured refutation.
• Indicators Development: Track radicalization signals and propaganda patterns to anticipate operational planning.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Deconstruct and track propaganda or influence narratives.

Explore more:
Counter-Terrorism Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us