Published on: 2026-02-12

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: NJ prosecutors targeted me for DEFENDING a victim of antisemitic violence

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The arrest and prosecution of Moshe Glick for defending a victim of antisemitic violence at a New Jersey synagogue raises concerns about potential bias and selective enforcement within the local justice system. The most likely hypothesis is that the prosecution was influenced by political or social biases, affecting community trust in law enforcement. This assessment is made with moderate confidence due to limited corroborative evidence and potential bias in the source material.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The prosecution of Moshe Glick was a result of selective enforcement driven by political or social biases within the local justice system. Supporting evidence includes the lack of charges against the alleged aggressor and the focus on Glick despite video evidence of the assault. Key uncertainties include the internal motivations of the prosecutors and any external pressures they may have faced.
• Hypothesis B: The prosecution was based on legal grounds, with Glick’s actions being interpreted as exceeding self-defense. Supporting evidence includes the charges related to the use of a flashlight as a weapon. Contradicting evidence includes the lack of action against the aggressor and the context of the incident being a response to a violent act.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the apparent inconsistency in prosecutorial actions and the context of the incident. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include additional evidence of prosecutorial decision-making processes or new information about the incident’s context.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The video evidence accurately depicts the events; the local justice system is subject to political and social influences; Glick’s actions were primarily defensive.
• Information Gaps: Details of the internal decision-making process within the prosecutor’s office; comprehensive accounts from law enforcement officers present at the scene.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in the source material due to the personal involvement of the narrator; risk of selective reporting or omission of key facts by involved parties.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

This development could exacerbate tensions between Jewish communities and local authorities, potentially leading to decreased trust in law enforcement and increased community polarization. It may also influence broader narratives around antisemitism and justice system integrity.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased political activism and advocacy for justice reform within affected communities.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened security concerns at religious gatherings and potential for retaliatory actions.
• Cyber / Information Space: Possible exploitation of the incident in online narratives to further polarize communities or incite violence.
• Economic / Social: Potential impact on community cohesion and local economic activities due to increased tensions and security measures.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Monitor local community reactions and law enforcement responses; engage with community leaders to facilitate dialogue and de-escalation.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop partnerships with civil rights organizations to address systemic biases; enhance training for law enforcement on handling protests and community relations.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best: Resolution through dialogue and legal review, restoring trust.
  • Worst: Escalation of tensions leading to further violence or unrest.
  • Most-Likely: Continued legal and community advocacy efforts with gradual improvement in relations.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Moshe Glick – Arrested individual
• Altaf Sharif – Alleged aggressor
• Essex County Prosecutor’s Office
• Congregation Ohr Torah
• David Silberberg – Victim of assault

7. Thematic Tags

Counter-Terrorism, antisemitism, justice system, community relations, law enforcement, civil rights, protest dynamics, bias

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• ACH 2.0: Reconstruct likely threat actor intentions via hypothesis testing and structured refutation.
• Indicators Development: Track radicalization signals and propaganda patterns to anticipate operational planning.
• Narrative Pattern Analysis: Analyze spread/adaptation of ideological narratives for recruitment/incitement signals.
• Cognitive Bias Stress Test: Structured challenge to expose and correct biases.

Explore more:
Counter-Terrorism Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us