Published on: 2026-01-05

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: Chinese cyberattacks on Taiwan infrastructure averaged 26 million a day in 2025 report says

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

Chinese cyberattacks on Taiwan’s infrastructure have significantly increased, averaging 2.63 million attacks daily in 2025, with a notable rise in synchronization with military drills. This escalation is likely part of a broader strategy to exert pressure on Taiwan through hybrid warfare. The primary affected sectors include energy, emergency services, and telecommunications. Overall confidence in this assessment is moderate, given the consistency of reported data and known strategic objectives of China.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The increase in cyberattacks is a deliberate strategy by China to destabilize Taiwan and coerce political compliance. Supporting evidence includes the synchronization of cyberattacks with military activities and politically sensitive events. However, uncertainties remain regarding the full extent of coordination and strategic intent.
• Hypothesis B: The rise in cyberattacks is primarily opportunistic, driven by independent actors within China seeking technological advantage. While this could explain the targeting of technology sectors, it contradicts the observed coordination with military actions.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the alignment of cyber activities with military and political events, indicating a coordinated state-level strategy. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include evidence of decentralized attack origins or lack of synchronization with state actions.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: China has the capability and intent to conduct coordinated cyber and military operations; Taiwan’s reporting is accurate and comprehensive; cyberattacks are a component of broader hybrid warfare tactics.
• Information Gaps: Detailed attribution of cyberattacks to specific Chinese entities; internal Chinese strategic communications regarding Taiwan; Taiwan’s cyber defense capabilities and response effectiveness.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in Taiwanese reporting due to political tensions; risk of Chinese strategic deception in cyber operations to mislead attribution efforts.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

Continued cyber aggression could exacerbate tensions between China and Taiwan, potentially drawing in international stakeholders and increasing regional instability.

• Political / Geopolitical: Escalation could lead to increased diplomatic confrontations and potential involvement of allies such as the United States.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Heightened threat environment may necessitate increased defense readiness and cyber resilience measures in Taiwan.
• Cyber / Information Space: Enhanced cyber operations could lead to broader information warfare campaigns, affecting public perception and trust.
• Economic / Social: Disruptions in critical infrastructure could impact economic stability and social cohesion, particularly if attacks target essential services.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Increase monitoring of cyber activities, enhance defensive measures, and engage in diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop resilience strategies, strengthen international partnerships for cyber defense, and invest in capability development for rapid response.
• Scenario Outlook: Best: De-escalation through diplomatic channels; Worst: Escalation to military conflict; Most-Likely: Continued hybrid threats with periodic cyber and military provocations.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Not clearly identifiable from open sources in this snippet.

7. Thematic Tags

cybersecurity, hybrid warfare, Taiwan-China relations, critical infrastructure, geopolitical tensions, cyber-espionage, information warfare

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Adversarial Threat Simulation: Model and simulate actions of cyber adversaries to anticipate vulnerabilities and improve resilience.
• Indicators Development: Detect and monitor behavioral or technical anomalies across systems for early threat detection.
• Bayesian Scenario Modeling: Quantify uncertainty and predict cyberattack pathways using probabilistic inference.
• Network Influence Mapping: Map influence relationships to assess actor impact.

Explore more:
Cybersecurity Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us