Published on: 2026-01-11

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: UK co-owns UAE-controlled Somaliland port used against Sudan

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The UK’s co-ownership of the Berbera port, controlled by the UAE, raises potential conflicts of interest given its strategic use in supplying arms to the RSF in Sudan. This situation complicates the UK’s diplomatic stance on Sudan, where it has imposed sanctions on RSF leaders. The evidence suggests a moderate confidence level in the hypothesis that the port is part of a network supporting RSF activities.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The Berbera port is being used as part of a UAE-led logistical network to supply arms to the RSF in Sudan. Supporting evidence includes reports of Emirati infrastructure involvement and mounting evidence of UAE’s role in the Sudan conflict. Key uncertainties include the extent of the UK’s knowledge and involvement.
• Hypothesis B: The Berbera port is primarily a commercial venture unrelated to military logistics. This is supported by BII’s claim of the port’s disconnection from military facilities. Contradictory evidence includes the strategic nature of the port and its regional significance.
• Assessment: Hypothesis A is currently better supported due to the alignment of multiple sources indicating UAE involvement in Sudan. Indicators that could shift this judgment include credible evidence of the port’s exclusive commercial use or a change in UAE’s regional military posture.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The UAE is actively supporting the RSF; the UK is aware of the port’s strategic use; diplomatic pressures influence UK foreign policy decisions.
• Information Gaps: The specific nature of UK oversight in the port’s operations; direct evidence linking the port’s activities to RSF logistics.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in sources due to political motivations; UAE’s denial of involvement could be strategic deception.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

The involvement of UK interests in a port linked to RSF logistics could strain UK-UAE relations and complicate international diplomatic efforts in Sudan. Over time, this could impact regional stability and international perceptions of UK foreign policy coherence.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential diplomatic fallout between the UK and UAE; increased scrutiny on UK foreign investments.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Enhanced risk of regional instability as RSF activities continue; potential for increased arms flow into conflict zones.
• Cyber / Information Space: Possible information warfare targeting UK credibility; cyber threats to logistics and supply chain integrity.
• Economic / Social: Economic repercussions for UK businesses involved; social unrest in Sudan could escalate, affecting regional migration patterns.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Conduct a thorough review of UK investments in the region; increase intelligence monitoring of port activities and RSF logistics.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Strengthen diplomatic engagements with UAE to address concerns; develop contingency plans for potential regional escalations.
• Scenario Outlook: Best: UAE ceases support to RSF, reducing conflict intensity. Worst: Continued support leads to prolonged conflict and regional destabilization. Most-Likely: Ongoing diplomatic tensions with gradual adjustments in UK-UAE relations.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• British International Investment (BII)
• DP World
• Government of Somaliland
• General Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti)
• Amgad Fareid Eltayeb
• Genel Energy
• RakGas

7. Thematic Tags

national security threats, foreign investment, arms trafficking, Sudan conflict, UK-UAE relations, regional stability, port logistics, geopolitical strategy

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Cognitive Bias Stress Test: Expose and correct potential biases in assessments through red-teaming and structured challenge.
• Bayesian Scenario Modeling: Use probabilistic forecasting for conflict trajectories or escalation likelihood.
• Network Influence Mapping: Map influence relationships to assess actor impact.

Explore more:
National Security Threats Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us