Published on: 2026-01-17

AI-powered OSINT brief from verified open sources. Automated NLP signal extraction with human verification. See our Methodology and Why WorldWideWatchers.

Intelligence Report: US names Rubio Blair and Kushner to Gaza ‘Board of Peace’ to be chaired by Trump

1. BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front)

The establishment of a “Board of Peace” chaired by Trump to oversee Gaza’s governance introduces a complex geopolitical dynamic with potential colonial undertones. The involvement of high-profile figures like Rubio, Blair, and Kushner may exacerbate regional tensions, particularly given the absence of Palestinian representation. This initiative is likely to face significant scrutiny and opposition, with moderate confidence in its ability to stabilize the region.

2. Competing Hypotheses

• Hypothesis A: The “Board of Peace” will effectively stabilize Gaza by providing international oversight and support, leveraging the influence of its members to enforce the ceasefire and facilitate governance. Supporting evidence includes the formal agreement by Israel and Hamas and the backing of a U.N. Security Council resolution. Contradicting evidence includes the lack of Palestinian representation and criticism of the board’s composition.
• Hypothesis B: The board will exacerbate tensions and fail to stabilize Gaza due to perceived colonial structures and lack of local legitimacy. Supporting evidence includes criticism of Trump’s and Blair’s roles, historical grievances, and ongoing ceasefire violations. Contradicting evidence includes the formal international and regional backing of the initiative.
• Assessment: Hypothesis B is currently better supported due to the significant local and international criticism and the absence of Palestinian voices, which undermines the board’s legitimacy. Key indicators that could shift this judgment include successful implementation of governance measures and reduction in ceasefire violations.

3. Key Assumptions and Red Flags

• Assumptions: The board members will act in good faith to stabilize Gaza; international backing will translate into effective governance; local actors will cooperate with the board.
• Information Gaps: Specific roles and responsibilities of board members; detailed plans for governance and stabilization; Palestinian public opinion on the board.
• Bias & Deception Risks: Potential bias in reporting from U.S. and allied sources; manipulation of information by involved parties to influence international perception; historical bias against colonial structures.

4. Implications and Strategic Risks

This development could lead to increased geopolitical tensions and challenges in implementing effective governance in Gaza. The board’s success or failure will significantly impact regional stability and international relations.

• Political / Geopolitical: Potential for increased tensions between local and international actors; risk of undermining Palestinian self-determination.
• Security / Counter-Terrorism: Possible escalation of violence if the board is perceived as illegitimate; challenges in maintaining the ceasefire.
• Cyber / Information Space: Potential for misinformation campaigns by opposing factions; increased cyber activity targeting board operations.
• Economic / Social: Risk of economic instability if governance measures fail; social unrest due to perceived foreign intervention.

5. Recommendations and Outlook

• Immediate Actions (0–30 days): Monitor board activities and local reactions; engage with Palestinian leaders to address representation concerns; prepare for potential escalation in violence.
• Medium-Term Posture (1–12 months): Develop partnerships with regional actors to support governance efforts; enhance intelligence capabilities to detect and counter misinformation.
• Scenario Outlook:
  • Best Case: Board successfully stabilizes Gaza, reducing violence and fostering cooperation.
  • Worst Case: Board fails, leading to increased violence and regional instability.
  • Most Likely: Board faces significant challenges, with limited success in stabilizing the region.

6. Key Individuals and Entities

• Donald Trump (Chair of the Board)
• Marco Rubio (U.S. Secretary of State)
• Tony Blair (Former British Prime Minister)
• Jared Kushner (Trump’s son-in-law)
• Steve Witkoff (Trump’s special envoy)
• Marc Rowan (Private equity executive)
• Ajay Banga (World Bank President)
• Nickolay Mladenov (High representative for Gaza)
• Hakan Fidan (Turkish Foreign Minister)
• Sigrid Kaag (U.N. special coordinator for the Middle East peace process)
• Reem Al-Hashimy (UAE Minister for International Cooperation)
• Yakir Gabay (Israeli-Cypriot billionaire)
• Jasper Jeffers (U.S. special operations commander)

7. Thematic Tags

regional conflicts, geopolitics, Middle East peace process, international governance, ceasefire, colonialism, regional stability, international relations

Structured Analytic Techniques Applied

• Causal Layered Analysis (CLA): Analyze events across surface happenings, systems, worldviews, and myths.
• Cross-Impact Simulation: Model ripple effects across neighboring states, conflicts, or economic dependencies.
• Scenario Generation: Explore divergent futures under varying assumptions to identify plausible paths.

Explore more:
Regional Conflicts Briefs ·
Daily Summary ·
Support us